Crazy Loop

The quiet revolution of no-code and low-code development

The quiet revolution of no-code and low-code development

The quiet revolution of no-code and low-code development

Not so long ago, building software meant one of two things: hire a developer, or forget your idea. Today, a solo marketer can build a customer portal, an HR manager can automate onboarding, and a chef can launch a booking system—without touching a line of traditional code.

This is the quiet revolution of no-code and low-code development. It doesn’t forcément make la une des journaux like generative AI, but it’s changing who gets to build digital products, how fast they ship, and how companies think about software strategy.

What no-code and low-code actually mean (without the buzzwords)

Let’s strip it down to basics.

No-code platforms let you build applications using visual interfaces: drag-and-drop components, forms, workflows, logic blocks. You manipulate data, rules, and design without writing syntax. Examples include:

Low-code platforms sit in between no-code and traditional development. They provide a visual foundation but let developers extend or customize behavior using code fragments (JavaScript, SQL, Python, etc.). Examples:

So the difference is less about marketing labels and more about who they target:

In both cases, the promise is the same: turn ideas into working software dramatically faster, with fewer technical barriers.

Why this revolution is happening now

Visual tools for building apps aren’t new. We saw them in the 90s and 2000s. So why is no-code/low-code suddenly becoming strategically important?

Several forces are colliding:

Add to that one cultural shift: people in non-technical roles are increasingly comfortable “tinkering” with tools. Whether it’s building an advanced spreadsheet in Notion or an automation in Zapier, the mental barrier to “building software” is much lower than 10 years ago.

What you can really build today (beyond toy apps)

No-code and low-code are not just for prototyping landing pages anymore. Let’s look at what’s realistically possible in 2025.

Internal tools and dashboards

This is where low-code shines the most.

Tooling like Retool, Appsmith or Microsoft Power Apps is often used exactly for this: replacing fragile Excel monsters and email threads with structured internal apps.

Public-facing products

Can you build something your customers actually pay for, fully or mostly in no-code? Yes—within certain boundaries.

Plenty of micro-SaaS products today generate revenue while running largely on no-code stacks (sometimes with custom code for performance and security-sensitive parts).

Automations and glue

This is the quiet backbone of many companies today.

Here, no-code tools don’t try to replace developers—they free them from building and maintaining tedious integrations and allow engineers to focus on core logic.

The upside: speed, ownership, and experimentation

Why are teams embracing no-code and low-code, beyond the hype?

The most interesting part is not that non-technical people can “play developer”. It’s the organizational effect: people stop seeing software as a distant, specialized artifact, and start seeing it as a tool they can actively shape.

The limits: when no-code and low-code hit the wall

Now the less glamorous side. These platforms are powerful, but far from magic. There are very real constraints you need to keep in mind.

Scalability and performance

No-code tools often work wonderfully for the first 100 or 1,000 users. Problems start when you need:

At that stage, teams frequently migrate critical parts to custom code or hybrid architectures.

Vendor lock-in

If your core business runs on a proprietary no-code platform, switching providers can be painful. Your data is exportable, but your logic (workflows, conditions, UI behavior) is often not.

Questions worth asking before you commit:

Complex logic and edge cases

No-code platforms are fantastic for the 80% of use cases that follow common patterns. The last 20%—the weird edge cases, the advanced permissions, the tricky business rules—can become messy.

As complexity grows, visual workflows may become harder to reason about than code. A diagram with 60 boxes and arrows is not necessarily more readable than 100 lines of well-structured code.

Security and compliance

Reputable platforms invest heavily in security, but you’re still delegating part of your stack. For highly regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), that can be a blocker.

You need to check:

And, of course, a careless admin can still create an insecure workflow—no-code doesn’t magically solve human error.

What this means for developers (hint: it’s not the apocalypse)

Every new abstraction layer in software history came with the same fear: “This will replace developers.” We heard it with high-level languages, frameworks, libraries, and now no-code.

Reality is more nuanced.

Developers move up the stack

As routine tasks are handled by no-code, developers can focus on:

New collaboration patterns

Instead of a wall between “business” and “engineering”, you get shared responsibility:

More room for product-minded developers

Developers who understand UX, business impact, and experimentation become even more valuable. They can act as architects of a larger ecosystem where no-code and code coexist, not as gatekeepers of all things technical.

How to adopt no-code/low-code without creating chaos

Letting everyone spin up apps and workflows can quickly turn into a digital Wild West. Shadow IT, duplicated data, security holes—pick your poison. The alternative is not to ban no-code, but to frame it.

Some pragmatic guidelines:

1. Start with low-risk, high-annoyance processes

Look for repetitive, manual workflows that irritate everyone but don’t touch highly sensitive data:

It’s enough to see the value clearly, without betting the company’s core product on a new platform from day one.

2. Define a basic governance model

You don’t need a 40-page PDF, but you do need guardrails:

Having one central place where people list the no-code tools and workflows in production can already prevent many surprises.

3. Involve developers early—just not for everything

Ask engineering teams to:

The goal isn’t to slow things down with bureaucracy; it’s to avoid painful refactors caused by early “quick hacks”.

4. Invest a little time in education

No-code is still software. Bad architecture, no backups, unreadable workflows—it can all happen in visual tools too.

Offer short internal sessions on:

A few hours of training can save days of debugging later.

What to watch in the next 3–5 years

The current wave of no-code and low-code is only an early version of what’s coming. A few trends are worth tracking if you’re building or buying software.

AI-assisted app building

We already see it: “Describe the app you want and we’ll scaffold it for you.” Combine no-code with generative AI and suddenly:

The “citizen developer” may soon have an AI pair-programmer inside the visual tool itself.

More specialized vertical platforms

Instead of generic builders that do a bit of everything, we’ll see:

The trade-off is clear: less flexibility, more domain expertise out-of-the-box.

Deeper integration with “traditional” development

Expect better bridges between no-code and code:

Over time, the line between “no-code” and “code” may blur into “composable software development”, where visual tools, scripts, and services all play their part.

So, should you care?

If you work in tech, product, or operations, ignoring no-code and low-code in 2025 is like ignoring cloud computing in 2010. You may not need to become an expert builder yourself, but you do need a position.

For individuals, it’s an opportunity to level up your digital autonomy. For companies, it’s a lever to ship faster, reduce bottlenecks, and make technology a shared responsibility.

Just don’t buy the fairy tale of “no more developers needed”. The quiet revolution of no-code and low-code isn’t about erasing technical work; it’s about redistributing it—closer to the people who understand the problems best, with developers focusing where their expertise has the highest impact.

And if your next “side project” or internal tool starts in a browser, with drag-and-drop blocks instead of a blank code editor, that doesn’t make it less serious. It just means the definition of what it means to “build software” is expanding—quietly, but decisively.

— Lili Moreau

Quitter la version mobile